
When “Flour is Pricier Than Bread”: The Jadeite Speculation Crisis
Introduction
Between 2009–2010, Myanmar’s jadeite rough auctions saw prices skyrocket by 15,000%, with speculators—not artisans—dominating bids, creating what became known as the jadeite speculation bubble. Professor Michelle Au dissects this unsustainable “flour > bread” phenomenon (where raw materials outprice finished goods) and its lasting damage to the jade ecosystem.
1. The Speculation Bubble: Key Drivers
1.1 New Buyer Profiles
- “Coal Tycoons”: Chinese industrialists stockpiling rough as “hard assets.”
- Diamond Traders: Shifting to jadeite for higher margins (5% → 200% profits).
- Retail Speculators: Paying 50M RMB for ice-grade bangle rough—then reselling unprocessed.
1.2 Price Escalation (2001–2010)
Year | Price/kg (RMB) | Trigger |
---|---|---|
2001 | 10,000 | Baseline |
2008 | 400,000 | Beijing Olympics luxury boom |
2010 | 1,500,000 | Speculative capital influx |
The jadeite speculation bubble of 2009-2010 represented one of the most extreme commodity surges in recent history, with raw stone values increasing 150-fold in just one year.
2. Market Distortions
2.1 The “Middleman Merry-Go-Round”
- 70% of premium rough circulated among dealers—only 30% reached consumers.
- Case Study: A Taiwanese merchant sold a 1M RMB bangle in 2008, only to find its replacement cost 5M RMB by 2010.
2.2 Consumer Backlash
- Psychological Threshold: “Ice” bangles priced at 500K RMB deterred 90% of buyers.
- Substitution Effect: Collectors shifted to sapphires/antique jade.
3. The Fallout & Lessons
3.1 2012 Correction
- -40% Price Drop: Speculators offloaded stocks, revealing true demand.
- Survivors: Traditional workshops with pre-2008 inventory.
3.2 Sustainable Practices
- Certify Origins: Blockchain tracking for rough-to-retail journeys.
- Price Anchoring: Tie retail prices to labor + 30% margin, not auction hype.
- Educate New Buyers: Warn against “get-rich-quick” jade schemes.
Source: Ouyang, Q. (2010). When Rough Outprices Polished: Jadeite’s Speculation Crisis. China Gems & Jades,124–127.

「麵粉貴過麵包」:翡翠投機泡沫的警示
引言
2009–2010年,緬甸翡翠原石拍賣價暴漲150倍,投機客(而非玉雕師)主導市場。歐陽秋眉教授解析這場「原料價>成品價」的畸形現象及其對產業的長期傷害。
1. 泡沫成因
1.1 新買家類型
- 「煤老闆」:將原石作為「硬資產」囤積。
- 鑽石商:轉戰翡翠追求暴利(利潤率5%→200%)。
- 零售投機者:以5000萬人民幣競標冰種手鐲料後,直接轉售牟利。
1.2 價格飆升(2001–2010)
年份 | 每公斤價格(人民幣) | 導火線 |
---|---|---|
2001 | 1萬 | 基準線 |
2008 | 40萬 | 北京奧運奢侈品熱 |
2010 | 150萬 | 熱錢湧入 |
2. 市場扭曲現象
2.1 「中間商擊鼓傳花」
- 70%高端原料在商家間流轉,僅30%到達終端消費者。
- 案例:台灣商人2008年以100萬售出手鐲,2010年同級貨進價已達500萬。
2.2 消費者抵制
- 心理門檻:50萬人民幣的「冰鐲」嚇退90%買家。
- 替代效應:藏家轉向藍寶石/古董翡翠。
3. 泡沫破裂與啟示
3.1 2012年修正
- 價格暴跌40%:投機者拋售庫存,真實需求浮現。
- 生存者:持有2008年前庫存的傳統工坊。
3.2 永續經營之道
- 溯源認證:區塊鏈追蹤原料到成品的歷程。
- 定價錨定:零售價應基於工藝成本+30%利潤,而非拍賣炒作。
- 買家教育:警惕「翡翠暴利」話術。
資料來源:歐陽秋眉(2010),無價的石頭——「麵粉比麵包貴」對翡翠市場的影響,《中國寶石與玉石》,124–127。
Read More
- The Global Jadeite Market: Cultural Forces & Future Trends
- The Science of “Inky Black Jade”: Omphacite Jade Explained by Prof. Michelle Au
- Can Myanmar Jade Auctions Predict Retail Prices? Market Realities by Prof. Michelle Au
- Classifying Burmese Jadeite: Mineralogy & Infrared Spectroscopy by Prof. Michelle Au
- Why Padparadscha Sapphires Lost Their Value: The Heat Treatment Controversy
- The Symbolic Language of Jadeite: Decoding Auspicious Motifs in Chinese Culture
- Jadeite Texture Types & Their Geological Significance – Prof. Michelle Au’s Structural Analysis
- The Mineral Composition of Jadeite: A Scientific Breakdown by Professor Michelle Au
- Will Jadeite Prices Continue to Rise? – Insights from Professor Michelle Au